CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Afold
MCC 0.642 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.092 > 0.445 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.561 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.740 > 0.491
Total TP 142 > 108
Total TN 34627 > 34599
Total FP 53 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 12
Total FP INCONS 33 < 100
Total FP COMP 3 < 21
Total FN 111 < 145
P-value 1.77512146924e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 34627
Total FP 53
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 111
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 34599
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.