CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.655 > 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.088 > 0.385 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.572 > 0.242
Positive Predictive Value 0.755 > 0.670
Total TP 163 > 69
Total TN 37502 < 37615
Total FP 56 > 37
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 5
Total FP INCONS 33 > 29
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 122 < 216
P-value 1.98760236454e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 37502
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.572
Positive Predictive Value 0.755
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
PDB_01092 0.72 0.62 0.84 32 10115 8 0 6 2 20
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.56 0.60 9 2001 6 0 6 0 7
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 37615
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 216
Total Scores
MCC 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.385 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.242
Positive Predictive Value 0.670
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.60 0.43 0.86 6 939 2 0 1 1 8
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_01092 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10153 0 0 0 0 52
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1881 1 0 1 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 17 2 13 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.