CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.660 > 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.030 > 0.151 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.538 > 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.811 > 0.135
Total TP 2806 > 910
Total TN 2962821 > 2959560
Total FP 733 < 5926
Total FP CONTRA 115 < 786
Total FP INCONS 537 < 5023
Total FP COMP 81 < 117
Total FN 2411 < 4307
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2806
Total TN 2962821
Total FP 733
Total FP CONTRA 115
Total FP INCONS 537
Total FP COMP 81
Total FN 2411
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.811
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.77 0.62 0.96 68 62410 4 2 1 1 42
ASE_00185 0.70 0.51 0.97 65 73469 2 1 1 0 63
ASE_00190 0.64 0.52 0.78 47 45391 17 0 13 4 43
ASE_00221 0.78 0.68 0.89 80 64530 10 1 9 0 37
ASE_00228 0.70 0.62 0.79 53 46904 15 5 9 1 33
ASE_00229 0.74 0.61 0.90 53 42427 8 0 6 2 34
ASE_00231 0.59 0.46 0.76 44 47837 18 0 14 4 52
ASE_00234 0.50 0.32 0.77 41 75413 12 3 9 0 88
ASE_00238 0.59 0.46 0.78 52 64194 16 0 15 1 62
ASE_00248 0.73 0.62 0.87 71 62399 11 3 8 0 43
ASE_00254 0.79 0.68 0.92 56 36795 6 0 5 1 26
ASE_00255 0.49 0.40 0.60 52 74605 35 1 33 1 78
ASE_00257 0.62 0.52 0.75 50 50973 17 3 14 0 47
ASE_00267 0.82 0.75 0.89 66 45076 9 3 5 1 22
ASE_00270 0.30 0.18 0.50 23 72344 25 1 22 2 105
ASE_00274 0.50 0.36 0.69 37 55557 17 5 12 0 66
ASE_00277 0.48 0.37 0.62 34 48150 21 4 17 0 57
ASE_00279 0.74 0.60 0.91 61 53234 6 0 6 0 40
ASE_00285 0.63 0.48 0.84 58 68937 11 2 9 0 64
ASE_00287 0.63 0.48 0.84 49 54888 9 1 8 0 54
ASE_00294 0.64 0.47 0.87 81 114388 14 2 10 2 90
ASE_00298 0.65 0.51 0.83 58 67458 12 5 7 0 55
ASE_00318 0.74 0.60 0.91 71 80122 17 2 5 10 47
ASE_00335 0.70 0.62 0.80 72 75376 24 5 13 6 44
ASE_00340 0.65 0.55 0.76 47 45994 15 7 8 0 38
ASE_00367 0.78 0.65 0.93 56 43011 4 0 4 0 30
ASE_00370 0.66 0.51 0.84 43 41854 8 0 8 0 41
ASE_00372 0.74 0.62 0.87 62 51932 9 0 9 0 38
ASE_00376 0.73 0.58 0.92 61 56887 6 0 5 1 44
ASE_00377 0.73 0.59 0.90 63 57560 7 0 7 0 44
ASE_00386 0.75 0.64 0.90 61 50335 7 2 5 0 35
ASE_00393 0.67 0.58 0.78 54 47826 16 2 13 1 39
ASE_00412 0.61 0.49 0.76 51 58244 20 0 16 4 54
ASE_00413 0.60 0.52 0.70 42 44491 21 4 14 3 39
ASE_00416 0.70 0.60 0.83 76 77329 16 2 14 0 51
ASE_00422 0.69 0.59 0.82 55 46904 13 0 12 1 39
ASE_00428 0.66 0.54 0.80 68 76551 17 1 16 0 57
ASE_00430 0.69 0.57 0.83 55 46905 12 0 11 1 42
ASE_00437 0.45 0.36 0.58 48 79318 35 2 33 0 87
ASE_00451 0.70 0.56 0.86 70 70795 11 3 8 0 55
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
TMR_00123 0.70 0.55 0.89 56 66367 12 1 6 5 45
TMR_00399 0.63 0.56 0.70 53 64904 27 6 17 4 41
TMR_00443 0.73 0.63 0.86 65 67085 15 6 5 4 39
TMR_00469 0.70 0.60 0.81 60 64546 14 7 7 0 40
TMR_00519 0.57 0.48 0.67 46 63121 25 7 16 2 49
TMR_00528 0.54 0.47 0.62 46 63116 34 9 19 6 51
TMR_00571 0.75 0.69 0.83 68 60644 20 3 11 6 31
TMR_00584 0.75 0.68 0.83 66 60995 17 2 12 3 31
TMR_00703 0.67 0.54 0.83 53 67464 15 1 10 4 46

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 910
Total TN 2959560
Total FP 5926
Total FP CONTRA 786
Total FP INCONS 5023
Total FP COMP 117
Total FN 4307
Total Scores
MCC 0.152
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.151 ± 0.030
Sensitivity 0.174
Positive Predictive Value 0.135
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00083 0.22 0.25 0.20 27 62347 108 12 95 1 83
ASE_00185 0.17 0.19 0.16 24 73382 134 14 116 4 104
ASE_00190 0.24 0.28 0.21 25 45334 93 14 78 1 65
ASE_00221 0.20 0.21 0.18 25 64484 112 10 101 1 92
ASE_00228 0.05 0.06 0.04 5 46858 109 17 91 1 81
ASE_00229 0.12 0.14 0.11 12 42380 97 12 82 3 75
ASE_00231 0.37 0.42 0.33 40 47773 84 17 65 2 56
ASE_00234 0.25 0.27 0.23 35 75315 117 10 106 1 94
ASE_00238 0.26 0.30 0.23 34 64111 119 18 98 3 80
ASE_00248 0.13 0.15 0.12 17 62340 124 9 115 0 97
ASE_00254 0.15 0.16 0.14 13 36761 88 3 79 6 69
ASE_00255 0.11 0.12 0.10 16 74530 146 16 129 1 114
ASE_00257 0.37 0.42 0.33 41 50917 85 15 67 3 56
ASE_00267 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45036 115 9 105 1 88
ASE_00270 0.19 0.21 0.17 27 72232 132 14 117 1 101
ASE_00274 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 55487 126 12 112 2 103
ASE_00277 0.10 0.12 0.08 11 48071 123 23 100 0 80
ASE_00279 0.14 0.16 0.13 16 53177 109 16 92 1 85
ASE_00285 0.34 0.36 0.31 44 68866 98 14 82 2 78
ASE_00287 0.15 0.17 0.14 17 54824 107 14 91 2 86
ASE_00294 0.12 0.13 0.12 23 114287 172 11 160 1 148
ASE_00298 0.09 0.10 0.08 11 67389 129 8 120 1 102
ASE_00318 0.03 0.04 0.03 5 80039 156 21 135 0 113
ASE_00335 0.10 0.12 0.09 14 75304 151 22 126 3 102
ASE_00340 0.06 0.07 0.05 6 45943 110 13 94 3 79
ASE_00367 0.08 0.09 0.07 8 42960 110 10 93 7 78
ASE_00370 0.03 0.04 0.03 3 41796 109 18 88 3 81
ASE_00372 0.17 0.20 0.15 20 51871 113 19 93 1 80
ASE_00376 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56822 136 9 122 5 105
ASE_00377 0.25 0.27 0.23 29 57505 98 10 86 2 78
ASE_00386 0.14 0.16 0.13 15 50284 106 9 95 2 81
ASE_00393 0.31 0.35 0.27 33 47773 90 18 71 1 60
ASE_00412 0.15 0.17 0.14 18 58183 111 14 96 1 87
ASE_00413 0.08 0.10 0.07 8 44438 108 19 86 3 73
ASE_00416 0.39 0.43 0.35 54 77267 103 18 82 3 73
ASE_00422 0.28 0.31 0.25 29 46856 87 9 77 1 65
ASE_00428 0.24 0.26 0.22 33 76483 121 13 107 1 92
ASE_00430 0.16 0.18 0.14 17 46852 102 10 92 0 80
ASE_00437 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 79238 164 12 151 1 135
ASE_00451 0.20 0.22 0.19 27 70731 118 8 110 0 98
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00399 0.20 0.26 0.16 24 64833 130 38 85 7 70
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.