CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.540 > 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.092 > 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.531 > 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.550 < 0.698
Total TP 822 > 287
Total TN 843580 < 844664
Total FP 779 > 125
Total FP CONTRA 104 > 6
Total FP INCONS 569 > 118
Total FP COMP 106 > 1
Total FN 725 < 1260
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 822
Total TN 843580
Total FP 779
Total FP CONTRA 104
Total FP INCONS 569
Total FP COMP 106
Total FN 725
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.49 0.48 0.51 57 77309 66 7 48 11 63
CRW_00610 0.55 0.53 0.57 43 36240 37 3 29 5 38
CRW_00613 0.64 0.58 0.70 45 34916 28 1 18 9 33
CRW_00618 0.17 0.18 0.16 11 56213 77 9 47 21 50
CRW_00633 0.55 0.54 0.56 57 63445 45 8 36 1 49
CRW_00634 0.33 0.34 0.33 32 64522 75 8 58 9 62
CRW_00670 0.74 0.72 0.76 86 70012 32 0 27 5 34
CRW_00671 0.65 0.62 0.67 73 62726 43 1 35 7 44
CRW_00672 0.66 0.66 0.66 73 72279 45 8 30 7 38
CRW_00674 0.68 0.67 0.69 83 83316 41 6 31 4 41
CRW_00676 0.58 0.62 0.55 71 93398 67 17 42 8 44
CRW_00692 0.43 0.46 0.40 41 68533 70 18 43 9 49
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00827 0.64 0.56 0.74 45 26967 17 0 16 1 36
PDB_01092 0.54 0.50 0.58 26 10108 21 2 17 2 26
RFA_00632 0.34 0.36 0.33 10 4065 20 2 18 0 18
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 15 2 13 0 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 287
Total TN 844664
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 1260
Total Scores
MCC 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.