CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.490 > 0.363
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.094 > 0.399 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.496 > 0.184
Positive Predictive Value 0.486 < 0.716
Total TP 852 > 317
Total TN 1068832 < 1070143
Total FP 1092 > 134
Total FP CONTRA 176 > 6
Total FP INCONS 726 > 120
Total FP COMP 190 > 8
Total FN 867 < 1402
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 852
Total TN 1068832
Total FP 1092
Total FP CONTRA 176
Total FP INCONS 726
Total FP COMP 190
Total FN 867
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.486
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.21 0.22 0.21 25 103620 117 13 82 22 90
CRW_00016 0.60 0.58 0.63 70 77309 55 5 37 13 50
CRW_00610 0.49 0.51 0.48 41 36230 44 9 35 0 40
CRW_00613 0.66 0.62 0.71 48 34912 28 1 19 8 30
CRW_00614 0.16 0.19 0.13 11 121684 137 27 49 61 46
CRW_00618 0.07 0.08 0.07 5 56205 92 15 55 22 56
CRW_00633 0.40 0.42 0.39 44 63434 70 10 58 2 62
CRW_00634 0.50 0.53 0.48 50 64516 59 11 43 5 44
CRW_00670 0.62 0.61 0.63 73 70009 45 9 34 2 47
CRW_00671 0.65 0.63 0.67 74 62725 43 1 35 7 43
CRW_00672 0.74 0.75 0.74 83 72278 38 6 23 9 28
CRW_00674 0.60 0.61 0.59 76 83308 55 10 42 3 48
CRW_00676 0.56 0.58 0.54 67 93403 71 15 43 13 48
CRW_00692 0.34 0.37 0.32 33 68532 80 22 48 10 57
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00827 0.59 0.53 0.65 43 26962 24 3 20 1 38
PDB_01092 0.66 0.60 0.74 31 10111 13 3 8 2 21
RFA_00632 0.31 0.32 0.30 9 4065 21 2 19 0 19
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 5 1 1 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 18 2 13 3 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 317
Total TN 1070143
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 1402
Total Scores
MCC 0.363
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.399 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.184
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.