CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.487 > 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.050 > 0.104 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.495 > 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.481 < 0.962
Total TP 2258 > 101
Total TN 2859928 < 2864514
Total FP 2848 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 433 > 3
Total FP INCONS 2000 > 1
Total FP COMP 415 > 1
Total FN 2308 < 4465
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2258
Total TN 2859928
Total FP 2848
Total FP CONTRA 433
Total FP INCONS 2000
Total FP COMP 415
Total FN 2308
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.481 ± 0.050
Sensitivity 0.495
Positive Predictive Value 0.481
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.74 0.73 0.74 55 34117 26 4 15 7 20
ASE_00002 0.63 0.62 0.64 45 35441 30 4 21 5 28
ASE_00009 0.71 0.70 0.72 47 26041 21 3 15 3 20
ASE_00014 0.42 0.43 0.42 46 54175 67 10 54 3 60
ASE_00116 0.25 0.26 0.25 17 31557 55 10 42 3 49
ASE_00120 0.48 0.49 0.47 46 46874 51 7 44 0 48
ASE_00121 0.31 0.33 0.31 30 45052 70 9 59 2 62
ASE_00145 0.46 0.46 0.46 51 70015 66 7 52 7 60
ASE_00148 0.60 0.60 0.61 92 112425 61 6 52 3 62
ASE_00154 0.63 0.64 0.64 68 65234 42 4 35 3 39
ASE_00155 0.54 0.54 0.54 76 93388 70 5 59 6 66
ASE_00187 0.44 0.44 0.44 51 68520 69 8 56 5 64
ASE_00196 0.74 0.73 0.75 55 31553 22 2 16 4 20
ASE_00205 0.46 0.47 0.46 42 45964 54 8 42 4 48
ASE_00209 0.40 0.39 0.41 34 42989 48 5 43 0 54
ASE_00210 0.47 0.48 0.47 31 27195 36 7 28 1 34
ASE_00213 0.73 0.73 0.73 48 27195 19 6 12 1 18
ASE_00222 0.46 0.46 0.46 72 111946 83 12 71 0 85
ASE_00346 0.42 0.41 0.42 40 48110 59 4 51 4 57
ASE_00359 0.45 0.46 0.44 37 42693 55 3 45 7 43
ASE_00360 0.31 0.32 0.31 21 29335 53 11 36 6 44
ASE_00417 0.44 0.45 0.43 45 54510 64 9 51 4 55
ASE_00418 0.33 0.33 0.32 25 38704 54 5 47 2 50
CRW_00013 0.21 0.22 0.21 25 103620 117 13 82 22 90
CRW_00016 0.60 0.58 0.63 70 77309 55 5 37 13 50
CRW_00610 0.49 0.51 0.48 41 36230 44 9 35 0 40
CRW_00613 0.66 0.62 0.71 48 34912 28 1 19 8 30
CRW_00614 0.16 0.19 0.13 11 121684 137 27 49 61 46
CRW_00618 0.07 0.08 0.07 5 56205 92 15 55 22 56
CRW_00633 0.40 0.42 0.39 44 63434 70 10 58 2 62
CRW_00634 0.50 0.53 0.48 50 64516 59 11 43 5 44
CRW_00670 0.62 0.61 0.63 73 70009 45 9 34 2 47
CRW_00671 0.65 0.63 0.67 74 62725 43 1 35 7 43
CRW_00672 0.74 0.75 0.74 83 72278 38 6 23 9 28
CRW_00674 0.60 0.61 0.59 76 83308 55 10 42 3 48
CRW_00676 0.56 0.58 0.54 67 93403 71 15 43 13 48
CRW_00692 0.34 0.37 0.32 33 68532 80 22 48 10 57
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00827 0.59 0.53 0.65 43 26962 24 3 20 1 38
PDB_01092 0.66 0.60 0.74 31 10111 13 3 8 2 21
RFA_00597 0.55 0.57 0.53 62 97786 78 17 38 23 47
RFA_00598 0.27 0.28 0.26 28 84559 99 13 66 20 73
RFA_00599 0.66 0.70 0.63 78 101351 67 17 29 21 33
RFA_00600 0.52 0.58 0.46 58 120169 111 26 42 43 42
RFA_00601 0.22 0.25 0.20 28 99098 124 19 90 15 86
RFA_00602 0.49 0.52 0.47 60 101347 91 15 53 23 56
RFA_00632 0.31 0.32 0.30 9 4065 21 2 19 0 19
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 0 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 5 1 1 3 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 18 2 13 3 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 2864514
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 4465
Total Scores
MCC 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.104 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.022
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34191 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 73
ASE_00009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 26106 0 0 0 0 67
ASE_00014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54285 0 0 0 0 106
ASE_00116 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00120 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46971 0 0 0 0 94
ASE_00121 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45150 0 0 0 0 92
ASE_00145 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 111
ASE_00148 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 112575 0 0 0 0 154
ASE_00154 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 65341 0 0 0 0 107
ASE_00155 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 142
ASE_00187 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 115
ASE_00196 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 31626 0 0 0 0 75
ASE_00205 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 46056 0 0 0 0 90
ASE_00209 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 43071 0 0 0 0 88
ASE_00210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00213 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27261 0 0 0 0 66
ASE_00222 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 112101 0 0 0 0 157
ASE_00346 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 48205 0 0 0 0 97
ASE_00359 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 42778 0 0 0 0 80
ASE_00360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 29403 0 0 0 0 65
ASE_00417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54615 0 0 0 0 100
ASE_00418 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 38781 0 0 0 0 75
CRW_00013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 103740 0 0 0 0 115
CRW_00016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 77421 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00610 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36315 0 0 0 0 81
CRW_00613 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 34980 0 0 0 0 78
CRW_00614 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 121771 0 0 0 0 57
CRW_00618 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 56280 0 0 0 0 61
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 64620 0 0 0 0 94
CRW_00670 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70125 0 0 0 0 120
CRW_00671 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 62835 0 0 0 0 117
CRW_00672 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 72390 0 0 0 0 111
CRW_00674 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 83436 0 0 0 0 124
CRW_00676 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 93528 0 0 0 0 115
CRW_00692 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 68635 0 0 0 0 90
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00827 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27028 0 0 0 0 81
PDB_01092 0.77 0.63 0.94 33 10118 3 1 1 1 19
RFA_00597 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 97903 0 0 0 0 109
RFA_00598 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 84666 0 0 0 0 101
RFA_00599 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 111
RFA_00600 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 120295 0 0 0 0 100
RFA_00601 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 99235 0 0 0 0 114
RFA_00602 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 101475 0 0 0 0 116
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16
RFA_00809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.