CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.600 > 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110 > 0.343 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.518 > 0.405
Positive Predictive Value 0.702 > 0.302
Total TP 87 > 68
Total TN 19699 > 19598
Total FP 41 < 184
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 28
Total FP INCONS 30 < 129
Total FP COMP 4 < 27
Total FN 81 < 100
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 19699
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.702
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 19598
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 129
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.343 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.405
Positive Predictive Value 0.302
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00636 0.36 0.39 0.34 11 3973 29 0 21 8 17
RFA_00767 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00768 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00769 0.45 0.50 0.41 9 1931 18 2 11 5 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00779 0.45 0.56 0.37 10 1926 17 7 10 0 8
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9
RFA_00809 0.30 0.38 0.25 6 2121 18 6 12 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.