CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.633 > 0.257
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.098 > 0.281 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.562 > 0.240
Positive Predictive Value 0.716 > 0.283
Total TP 131 > 56
Total TN 46901 > 46886
Total FP 57 < 148
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 23
Total FP INCONS 41 < 119
Total FP COMP 5 < 6
Total FN 102 < 177
P-value 1.45096400029e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 46901
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 2 1 0 1 8
RFA_00779 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 0 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 9 1 8 0 10

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 56
Total TN 46886
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 119
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 177
Total Scores
MCC 0.257
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.281 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.240
Positive Predictive Value 0.283
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.10 0.09 0.11 6 27207 50 7 41 2 59
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00767 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1878 13 1 12 0 18
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2003 15 2 11 2 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 2 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 3 1 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.