CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold4 & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold4 CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.402 > 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.087 > 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.370 > 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.439 < 0.698
Total TP 572 > 287
Total TN 843771 < 844664
Total FP 800 > 125
Total FP CONTRA 117 > 6
Total FP INCONS 615 > 118
Total FP COMP 68 > 1
Total FN 975 < 1260
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 572
Total TN 843771
Total FP 800
Total FP CONTRA 117
Total FP INCONS 615
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 975
Total Scores
MCC 0.402
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.370
Positive Predictive Value 0.439
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.53 0.46 0.61 55 77331 44 4 31 9 65
CRW_00610 0.40 0.36 0.46 29 36252 37 5 29 3 52
CRW_00613 0.48 0.42 0.54 33 34919 34 2 26 6 45
CRW_00618 0.33 0.31 0.35 19 56225 57 6 30 21 42
CRW_00633 0.38 0.35 0.42 37 63457 52 6 46 0 69
CRW_00634 0.29 0.28 0.30 26 64533 68 8 53 7 68
CRW_00670 0.37 0.34 0.41 41 70025 60 3 56 1 79
CRW_00671 0.55 0.50 0.60 59 62736 40 2 38 0 58
CRW_00672 0.30 0.29 0.32 32 72291 71 14 53 4 79
CRW_00674 0.29 0.26 0.33 32 83339 67 8 57 2 92
CRW_00676 0.34 0.34 0.34 39 93413 80 20 56 4 76
CRW_00692 0.26 0.24 0.28 22 68555 62 20 38 4 68
PDB_00005 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00716 0.17 0.17 0.18 4 2679 19 0 18 1 19
PDB_00827 0.65 0.54 0.79 44 26972 13 0 12 1 37
PDB_01092 0.66 0.58 0.77 30 10114 10 2 7 1 22
RFA_00632 0.36 0.36 0.37 10 4068 17 3 14 0 18
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2003 15 2 11 2 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 2 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 3 1 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 287
Total TN 844664
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 1260
Total Scores
MCC 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.