CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.372 > 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.412 ± 0.105 > 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.348 > 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.401 < 0.698
Total TP 538 > 287
Total TN 843732 < 844664
Total FP 871 > 125
Total FP CONTRA 111 > 6
Total FP INCONS 694 > 118
Total FP COMP 66 > 1
Total FN 1009 < 1260
P-value 1.23414297917e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 538
Total TN 843732
Total FP 871
Total FP CONTRA 111
Total FP INCONS 694
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 1009
Total Scores
MCC 0.372
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.412 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.401
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.40 0.38 0.42 45 77315 67 4 57 6 75
CRW_00610 0.29 0.28 0.30 23 36238 57 6 48 3 58
CRW_00613 0.48 0.46 0.51 36 34909 41 2 33 6 42
CRW_00618 0.24 0.26 0.23 16 56210 76 9 45 22 45
CRW_00633 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 63546 0 0 0 0 106
CRW_00634 0.32 0.33 0.32 31 64523 75 10 56 9 63
CRW_00670 0.40 0.38 0.43 45 70020 61 3 57 1 75
CRW_00671 0.29 0.26 0.33 31 62740 64 2 62 0 86
CRW_00672 0.39 0.40 0.39 44 72278 70 14 54 2 67
CRW_00674 0.33 0.31 0.36 38 83330 74 5 63 6 86
CRW_00676 0.34 0.36 0.33 41 93405 88 19 63 6 74
CRW_00692 0.36 0.38 0.34 34 68534 67 21 46 0 56
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 1 2 0 3
PDB_00716 0.17 0.17 0.18 4 2679 19 0 18 1 19
PDB_00827 0.51 0.42 0.62 34 26973 22 0 21 1 47
PDB_01092 0.73 0.69 0.77 36 10106 12 2 9 1 16
RFA_00632 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4073 22 0 22 0 28
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 2003 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.69 0.61 0.79 11 1939 3 3 0 0 7
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00809 0.45 0.44 0.47 7 2130 8 1 7 0 9

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 287
Total TN 844664
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 1260
Total Scores
MCC 0.359
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.186
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.