CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.438 > 0.421
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.212 < 0.427 ± 0.227
Sensitivity 0.415 > 0.318
Positive Predictive Value 0.471 < 0.566
Total TP 90 > 69
Total TN 30846 < 30915
Total FP 120 > 54
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 3
Total FP INCONS 90 > 50
Total FP COMP 19 > 1
Total FN 127 < 148
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 30846
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.471
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 30915
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 148
Total Scores
MCC 0.421
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.227
Sensitivity 0.318
Positive Predictive Value 0.566
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.