CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold NanoFolder
MCC 0.463 > 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.462 ± 0.400 > 0.385 ± 0.426
Sensitivity 0.424 > 0.400
Positive Predictive Value 0.515 > 0.311
Total TP 53 > 50
Total TN 14173 > 14115
Total FP 60 < 124
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 19
Total FP INCONS 37 < 92
Total FP COMP 10 < 13
Total FN 72 < 75
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 53
Total TN 14173
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.462 ± 0.400
Sensitivity 0.424
Positive Predictive Value 0.515
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 5 14 1 25
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01009 0.52 0.57 0.48 12 2460 13 5 8 0 9
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 50
Total TN 14115
Total FP 124
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.346
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.385 ± 0.426
Sensitivity 0.400
Positive Predictive Value 0.311
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.