CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.779 > 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.139 < 0.786 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.617 < 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.988 > 0.861
Total TP 82 < 93
Total TN 14650 > 14625
Total FP 2 < 17
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 6
Total FP INCONS 1 < 9
Total FP COMP 1 < 2
Total FN 51 > 40
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 14650
Total FP 2
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.988
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 0 1 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.78 0.61 1.00 14 2264 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_01073 0.59 0.35 1.00 12 4359 1 0 0 1 22

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 14625
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 40
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.786 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.83 0.79 0.86 19 2256 3 2 1 0 5
PDB_01020 0.82 0.78 0.86 18 2257 4 2 1 1 5
PDB_01073 0.56 0.47 0.67 16 4347 9 1 7 1 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.