CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.527 > 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.153 > 0.295 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.491 > 0.176
Positive Predictive Value 0.573 < 0.670
Total TP 193 > 69
Total TN 48793 < 49027
Total FP 157 > 37
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 5
Total FP INCONS 123 > 29
Total FP COMP 13 > 3
Total FN 200 < 324
P-value 2.18141491686e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 193
Total TN 48793
Total FP 157
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 123
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 200
Total Scores
MCC 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.573
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.59 16 4344 12 1 10 1 18
PDB_01092 0.68 0.62 0.76 32 10111 12 1 9 2 20
RFA_00632 0.37 0.36 0.38 10 4069 19 0 16 3 18
RFA_00636 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 3978 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2002 17 1 13 3 18
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 49027
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 324
Total Scores
MCC 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.295 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.176
Positive Predictive Value 0.670
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.60 0.43 0.86 6 939 2 0 1 1 8
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00828 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 27
PDB_00829 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 24
PDB_01020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_01073 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 34
PDB_01092 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10153 0 0 0 0 52
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1881 1 0 1 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 17 2 13 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.