CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.566 > 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.253 > 0.369 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.332 < 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.971 > 0.314
Total TP 68 < 85
Total TN 23400 > 23199
Total FP 2 < 215
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 35
Total FP INCONS 0 < 151
Total FP COMP 0 < 29
Total FN 137 > 120
P-value 2.26545642304e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 23400
Total FP 2
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 137
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.332
Positive Predictive Value 0.971
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 2009 0 0 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 1 1 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2016 0 0 0 0 16
RFA_00809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 16

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 23199
Total FP 215
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 151
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 120
Total Scores
MCC 0.354
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.369 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.314
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.76 0.79 0.73 11 931 6 2 2 2 3
PDB_00716 0.22 0.26 0.19 6 2670 25 5 20 0 17
RFA_00636 0.36 0.39 0.34 11 3973 29 0 21 8 17
RFA_00767 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00768 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00769 0.45 0.50 0.41 9 1931 18 2 11 5 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00779 0.45 0.56 0.37 10 1926 17 7 10 0 8
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9
RFA_00809 0.30 0.38 0.25 6 2121 18 6 12 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.