CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.748 > 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.069 > 0.507 ± 0.168
Sensitivity 0.615 > 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.912 > 0.564
Total TP 187 > 146
Total TN 39377 > 39323
Total FP 19 < 134
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 12
Total FP INCONS 13 < 101
Total FP COMP 1 < 21
Total FN 117 < 158
P-value 2.1413769576e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 187
Total TN 39377
Total FP 19
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.748
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.912
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 0.75 0.61 0.93 14 2686 1 0 1 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2258 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01092 0.72 0.58 0.91 30 10120 4 0 3 1 22
RFA_00632 0.74 0.64 0.86 18 4074 3 2 1 0 10
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 146
Total TN 39323
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 101
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 158
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.168
Sensitivity 0.480
Positive Predictive Value 0.564
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.82 0.71 0.94 17 2260 1 0 1 0 7
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.