CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.767 > 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057 > 0.648 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.634 > 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.933 > 0.769
Total TP 249 > 220
Total TN 48863 > 48844
Total FP 21 < 69
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 15
Total FP INCONS 13 < 51
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 144 < 173
P-value 1.59816551561e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 249
Total TN 48863
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.767
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.933
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.75 0.61 0.93 14 2686 1 0 1 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2258 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01020 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 2259 1 0 0 1 4
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.72 0.58 0.91 30 10120 4 0 3 1 22
RFA_00632 0.74 0.64 0.86 18 4074 3 2 1 0 10
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 220
Total TN 48844
Total FP 69
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 939 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00716 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2684 12 0 12 0 18
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.74 0.60 0.91 31 10119 5 0 3 2 21
RFA_00632 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 4068 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.