CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) ContextFold
MCC 0.767 > 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057 > 0.556 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.634 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.933 > 0.642
Total TP 249 > 199
Total TN 48863 > 48820
Total FP 21 < 115
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 18
Total FP INCONS 13 < 93
Total FP COMP 3 < 4
Total FN 144 < 194
P-value 2.97012568641e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 249
Total TN 48863
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.767
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.933
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.75 0.61 0.93 14 2686 1 0 1 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2258 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01020 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 2259 1 0 0 1 4
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.72 0.58 0.91 30 10120 4 0 3 1 22
RFA_00632 0.74 0.64 0.86 18 4074 3 2 1 0 10
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 48820
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.