CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.767 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057 > 0.562 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.634 > 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.933 > 0.619
Total TP 249 > 210
Total TN 48863 > 48791
Total FP 21 < 142
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 17
Total FP INCONS 13 < 112
Total FP COMP 3 < 13
Total FN 144 < 183
P-value 2.30549897711e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 249
Total TN 48863
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.767
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.758 ± 0.057
Sensitivity 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.933
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.75 0.61 0.93 14 2686 1 0 1 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2258 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01020 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 2259 1 0 0 1 4
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.72 0.58 0.91 30 10120 4 0 3 1 22
RFA_00632 0.74 0.64 0.86 18 4074 3 2 1 0 10
RFA_00636 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 3984 2 2 0 0 9
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00779 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 210
Total TN 48791
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.73 0.63 0.85 33 10114 8 0 6 2 19
RFA_00632 0.39 0.39 0.39 11 4067 17 2 15 0 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00767 0.44 0.44 0.44 8 1873 10 1 9 0 10
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 10 1 8 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.