CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.771 > 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.153 > 0.512 ± 0.706
Sensitivity 0.633 > 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.943 > 0.448
Total TP 50 > 43
Total TN 8417 > 8374
Total FP 3 < 63
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 10
Total FP INCONS 2 < 43
Total FP COMP 0 < 10
Total FN 29 < 36
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 50
Total TN 8417
Total FP 3
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 29
Total Scores
MCC 0.771
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.943
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
RFA_00770 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 2006 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00773 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1943 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00808 0.65 0.56 0.75 9 2004 3 1 2 0 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 43
Total TN 8374
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 36
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.706
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.448
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.