CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Contrafold
MCC 0.482 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.084 > 0.525 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.430 < 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.548 > 0.491
Total TP 507 < 512
Total TN 158581 > 158463
Total FP 427 < 548
Total FP CONTRA 53 < 63
Total FP INCONS 365 < 468
Total FP COMP 9 < 17
Total FN 671 > 666
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 507
Total TN 158581
Total FP 427
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 365
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 671
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.548
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15219 6 0 6 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.59 0.41 0.86 18 7119 3 3 0 0 26
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00713 - 0.54 0.48 0.63 10 2000 6 1 5 0 11
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00804 - 0.22 0.24 0.21 12 15342 46 10 36 0 38
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.38 0.28 0.52 15 12691 14 0 14 0 39
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.71 0.63 0.80 33 10112 10 1 7 2 19
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 487 9 0 9 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1159 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.18 0.15 0.22 6 12063 21 5 16 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 1816 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 4072 6 1 5 0 11
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 4 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 512
Total TN 158463
Total FP 548
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 468
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 666
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.20 0.20 4 1015 16 2 14 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.25 0.25 0.29 4 616 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 486 10 2 8 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15185 40 4 36 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.66 0.55 0.80 24 7110 6 6 0 0 20
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1996 8 1 7 0 9
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00804 - 0.22 0.24 0.21 12 15342 46 10 36 0 38
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 2259 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 1071 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 19 0 18 1 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4146 40 0 40 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 2259 3 1 1 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.29 0.30 0.30 6 1108 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.41 0.37 0.45 20 12676 24 0 24 0 34
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.70 0.65 0.76 34 10108 14 2 9 3 18
PDB_01194 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 0 11 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1158 5 3 2 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 6 12061 23 5 18 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 1811 5 1 4 0 11
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 364 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9117 64 9 54 1 39
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 0 19 0 17
RFA_00636 0.60 0.64 0.56 18 3973 14 4 10 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 0 8 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.