CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold NanoFolder
MCC 0.628 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.153 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.554 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.719 > 0.281
Total TP 92 > 57
Total TN 18901 > 18826
Total FP 40 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 22
Total FP INCONS 29 < 124
Total FP COMP 4 < 13
Total FN 74 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 18901
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.719
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.