CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST ContextFold
MCC 0.488 > 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.079 > 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407 < 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.592 > 0.499
Total TP 479 < 480
Total TN 158697 > 158545
Total FP 335 < 491
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 52
Total FP INCONS 294 < 429
Total FP COMP 5 < 10
Total FN 699 > 698
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 479
Total TN 158697
Total FP 335
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 294
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 699
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.592
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 939 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 621 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.72 0.53 1.00 10 1215 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15225 0 0 0 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.30 0.09 1.00 4 7136 0 0 0 0 40
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 9 2004 3 0 3 0 12
PDB_00716 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2684 12 0 12 0 18
PDB_00804 - 0.54 0.34 0.85 17 15380 3 0 3 0 33
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.52 16 4722 15 0 15 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 1073 2 0 2 0 9
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 2466 2 0 0 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.39 0.19 0.83 10 12708 2 0 2 0 44
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.74 0.60 0.91 31 10119 5 0 3 2 21
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 487 9 0 9 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.79 0.64 1.00 14 1114 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01203 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1159 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.18 0.15 0.22 6 12063 21 5 16 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 1816 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.78 0.67 0.91 10 892 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 4068 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 158545
Total FP 491
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 429
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 698
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00018 - 0.22 0.20 0.27 4 1020 11 2 9 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.57 0.50 0.67 4 372 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 372 6 1 5 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.50 0.42 0.63 5 622 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.12 0.16 0.10 4 15185 36 7 29 0 21
PDB_00447 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7108 32 8 24 0 44
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.42 0.38 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.86 0.84 0.88 42 15352 8 0 6 2 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 8 12682 30 0 30 0 46
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.53 0.41 0.69 9 1115 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_01203 - 0.77 0.68 0.87 13 1161 2 2 0 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.22 0.20 0.24 8 12057 26 3 22 1 33
PDB_01260 - 0.52 0.36 0.75 9 1818 3 0 3 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 893 3 1 0 2 6
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9120 60 9 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.