CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.654 > 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.083 > 0.515 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.560 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.769 > 0.625
Total TP 220 > 168
Total TN 48844 < 48861
Total FP 69 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 41
Total FP INCONS 51 < 60
Total FP COMP 3 < 4
Total FN 173 < 225
P-value 2.7402423548e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 220
Total TN 48844
Total FP 69
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.70 0.50 1.00 7 939 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00716 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2684 12 0 12 0 18
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01073 0.84 0.71 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 10
PDB_01092 0.74 0.60 0.91 31 10119 5 0 3 2 21
RFA_00632 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 4068 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 3 7 0 10
RFA_00767 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00768 0.66 0.44 1.00 8 1883 0 0 0 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.58 0.39 0.88 7 2008 1 0 1 0 11
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 48861
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.71 0.57 0.89 8 937 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00716 0.59 0.48 0.73 11 2686 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00828 0.54 0.41 0.73 11 2470 4 2 2 0 16
PDB_00829 0.74 0.63 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_01020 0.76 0.65 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.39 0.18 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 28
PDB_01092 0.48 0.37 0.63 19 10123 13 1 10 2 33
RFA_00632 0.47 0.39 0.58 11 4076 8 3 5 0 17
RFA_00636 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 3984 6 3 3 0 13
RFA_00767 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00768 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 4 2 0 8
RFA_00770 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1997 9 6 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00779 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00808 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 2005 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00809 0.37 0.31 0.45 5 2134 7 0 6 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.