CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.567 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113 > 0.525 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 > 0.586
Total TP 199 > 197
Total TN 48820 > 48794
Total FP 115 < 147
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 24
Total FP INCONS 93 < 115
Total FP COMP 4 < 8
Total FN 194 < 196
P-value 2.9966815982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 48820
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 197
Total TN 48794
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 196
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.586
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.59 0.36 1.00 5 941 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2681 21 1 19 1 23
PDB_00828 0.82 0.67 1.00 18 2467 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 4343 4 1 2 1 9
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.79 33 10111 12 2 7 3 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 19 1 18 0 21
RFA_00636 0.35 0.36 0.36 10 3977 18 2 16 0 18
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.30 0.31 0.29 5 2128 12 1 11 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.