CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.759 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.209 > 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.669 > 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.864 > 0.693
Total TP 89 > 61
Total TN 14630 < 14645
Total FP 15 < 28
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 4
Total FP INCONS 11 < 23
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 44 < 72
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 14630
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 44
Total Scores
MCC 0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.669
Positive Predictive Value 0.864
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 14645
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.485
Sensitivity 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3302 20 3 16 1 25
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 2263 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.34 0.24 0.50 8 4355 8 1 7 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.