CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.567 > 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113 > 0.295 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.176
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 < 0.670
Total TP 199 > 69
Total TN 48820 < 49027
Total FP 115 > 37
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 5
Total FP INCONS 93 > 29
Total FP COMP 4 > 3
Total FN 194 < 324
P-value 2.97012568641e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 48820
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 49027
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 324
Total Scores
MCC 0.341
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.295 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.176
Positive Predictive Value 0.670
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.60 0.43 0.86 6 939 2 0 1 1 8
PDB_00716 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_00828 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 27
PDB_00829 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 24
PDB_01020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 23
PDB_01073 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 34
PDB_01092 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10153 0 0 0 0 52
RFA_00632 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4095 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4005 0 0 0 0 28
RFA_00767 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1881 1 0 1 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00773 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 1942 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 0 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 17 2 13 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.