CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.447 > 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081 > 0.397 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.407 > 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.499 > 0.380
Total TP 480 > 416
Total TN 158545 > 158411
Total FP 491 < 724
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 111
Total FP INCONS 429 < 568
Total FP COMP 10 < 45
Total FN 698 < 762
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 158545
Total FP 491
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 429
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 698
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00018 - 0.22 0.20 0.27 4 1020 11 2 9 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.57 0.50 0.67 4 372 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 372 6 1 5 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.50 0.42 0.63 5 622 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.12 0.16 0.10 4 15185 36 7 29 0 21
PDB_00447 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7108 32 8 24 0 44
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.42 0.38 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.86 0.84 0.88 42 15352 8 0 6 2 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 8 12682 30 0 30 0 46
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.53 0.41 0.69 9 1115 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_01203 - 0.77 0.68 0.87 13 1161 2 2 0 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.22 0.20 0.24 8 12057 26 3 22 1 33
PDB_01260 - 0.52 0.36 0.75 9 1818 3 0 3 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 893 3 1 0 2 6
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9120 60 9 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 416
Total TN 158411
Total FP 724
Total FP CONTRA 111
Total FP INCONS 568
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 762
Total Scores
MCC 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.397 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.380
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.15 0.25 3 1023 9 2 7 0 17
PDB_00020 - 0.39 0.35 0.47 7 765 8 0 8 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.61 0.50 0.75 6 622 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 16
PDB_00123 - 0.31 0.33 0.30 12 4146 28 4 24 0 24
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 2 9 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 3 0 1 2 3
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 371 7 0 7 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.74 0.55 1.00 6 555 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.54 0.42 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1211 3 0 3 0 8
PDB_00370 - 0.34 0.48 0.25 12 15177 42 23 13 6 13
PDB_00447 - 0.22 0.20 0.25 9 7104 27 2 25 0 35
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00713 - 0.28 0.24 0.33 5 2001 11 0 10 1 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00804 - 0.23 0.24 0.22 12 15345 53 6 37 10 38
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.34 0.34 0.35 14 4713 26 0 26 0 27
PDB_00857 - 0.57 0.60 0.56 9 1065 7 0 7 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 18 0 18 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4143 43 4 39 0 40
PDB_00918 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 317 8 0 8 0 7
PDB_01009 0.45 0.52 0.39 11 2457 18 6 11 1 10
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01040 - 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1108 15 1 14 0 15
PDB_01059 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 226 5 1 4 0 7
PDB_01070 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12665 55 8 47 0 54
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01092 0.43 0.38 0.49 20 10112 23 2 19 2 32
PDB_01194 - 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01201 - 0.75 0.68 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1165 11 0 11 0 19
PDB_01250 - 0.45 0.44 0.46 18 12051 21 11 10 0 23
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1809 21 0 21 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 365 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.65 0.53 0.80 8 893 2 0 2 0 7
PDB_01309 - 0.26 0.31 0.22 12 9126 42 14 28 0 27
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.