CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.567 > 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113 > 0.515 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 > 0.625
Total TP 199 > 168
Total TN 48820 < 48861
Total FP 115 > 105
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 41
Total FP INCONS 93 > 60
Total FP COMP 4 = 4
Total FN 194 < 225
P-value 2.84041289224e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 199
Total TN 48820
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 48861
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.71 0.57 0.89 8 937 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00716 0.59 0.48 0.73 11 2686 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00828 0.54 0.41 0.73 11 2470 4 2 2 0 16
PDB_00829 0.74 0.63 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 9
PDB_01020 0.76 0.65 0.88 15 2261 2 2 0 0 8
PDB_01073 0.39 0.18 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 28
PDB_01092 0.48 0.37 0.63 19 10123 13 1 10 2 33
RFA_00632 0.47 0.39 0.58 11 4076 8 3 5 0 17
RFA_00636 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 3984 6 3 3 0 13
RFA_00767 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00768 0.19 0.17 0.23 3 1878 10 3 7 0 15
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 4 2 0 8
RFA_00770 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1997 9 6 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00779 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 6 3 0 9
RFA_00808 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 2005 4 0 3 1 8
RFA_00809 0.37 0.31 0.45 5 2134 7 0 6 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.