CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Sfold
MCC 0.447 > 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081 > 0.503 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.407 > 0.377
Positive Predictive Value 0.499 > 0.488
Total TP 480 > 444
Total TN 158545 < 158596
Total FP 491 > 477
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 54
Total FP INCONS 429 > 412
Total FP COMP 10 < 11
Total FN 698 < 734
P-value 8.81311508309e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 158545
Total FP 491
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 429
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 698
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00018 - 0.22 0.20 0.27 4 1020 11 2 9 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.57 0.50 0.67 4 372 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 372 6 1 5 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.50 0.42 0.63 5 622 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.12 0.16 0.10 4 15185 36 7 29 0 21
PDB_00447 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7108 32 8 24 0 44
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.42 0.38 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.86 0.84 0.88 42 15352 8 0 6 2 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 8 12682 30 0 30 0 46
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.53 0.41 0.69 9 1115 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_01203 - 0.77 0.68 0.87 13 1161 2 2 0 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.22 0.20 0.24 8 12057 26 3 22 1 33
PDB_01260 - 0.52 0.36 0.75 9 1818 3 0 3 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 893 3 1 0 2 6
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9120 60 9 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 444
Total TN 158596
Total FP 477
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 412
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 734
Total Scores
MCC 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.377
Positive Predictive Value 0.488
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.71 0.58 0.88 7 622 1 0 1 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1210 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15225 0 0 0 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.26 0.07 1.00 3 7137 0 0 0 0 41
PDB_00571 0.21 0.20 0.24 5 3300 16 6 10 0 20
PDB_00713 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 9 2004 3 0 3 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_00804 - 0.19 0.20 0.18 10 15344 46 10 36 0 40
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.05 0.05 0.08 1 933 12 2 10 0 19
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.33 0.26 0.44 14 12688 18 0 18 0 40
PDB_01073 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 12
PDB_01092 0.76 0.63 0.92 33 10117 5 0 3 2 19
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.71 0.63 0.80 12 1161 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.13 0.10 0.17 4 12066 20 3 17 0 37
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 1816 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9118 62 9 53 0 39
RFA_00632 0.24 0.25 0.25 7 4067 21 2 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 16 2 14 0 17
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 7 1 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.52 0.56 0.50 10 1933 10 4 6 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 1 6 0 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.