CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Vsfold4
MCC 0.447 > 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081 > 0.477 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.407 > 0.380
Positive Predictive Value 0.499 > 0.479
Total TP 480 > 448
Total TN 158545 < 158571
Total FP 491 < 501
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 59
Total FP INCONS 429 > 428
Total FP COMP 10 < 14
Total FN 698 < 730
P-value 4.83792096436e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 158545
Total FP 491
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 429
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 698
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00018 - 0.22 0.20 0.27 4 1020 11 2 9 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.57 0.50 0.67 4 372 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 372 6 1 5 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.50 0.42 0.63 5 622 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.12 0.16 0.10 4 15185 36 7 29 0 21
PDB_00447 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7108 32 8 24 0 44
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.42 0.38 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.86 0.84 0.88 42 15352 8 0 6 2 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 8 12682 30 0 30 0 46
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.53 0.41 0.69 9 1115 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_01203 - 0.77 0.68 0.87 13 1161 2 2 0 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.22 0.20 0.24 8 12057 26 3 22 1 33
PDB_01260 - 0.52 0.36 0.75 9 1818 3 0 3 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 893 3 1 0 2 6
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9120 60 9 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 448
Total TN 158571
Total FP 501
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 428
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 730
Total Scores
MCC 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.380
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 936 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.46 0.35 0.64 7 769 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 618 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00123 - 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 4154 20 0 20 0 24
PDB_00124 - 0.59 0.50 0.71 5 489 2 0 2 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.17 0.14 0.25 2 488 6 1 5 0 12
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1210 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15188 37 15 22 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.28 0.23 0.34 10 7111 19 2 17 0 34
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.47 0.43 0.53 9 1999 8 0 8 0 12
PDB_00716 0.17 0.17 0.18 4 2679 19 0 18 1 19
PDB_00804 - 0.41 0.38 0.45 19 15358 25 0 23 2 31
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.56 0.44 0.72 18 4728 7 0 7 0 23
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 936 10 0 10 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4152 34 0 34 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.65 0.43 1.00 3 228 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_01070 - 0.43 0.37 0.50 20 12680 20 0 20 0 34
PDB_01073 0.55 0.47 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 18
PDB_01092 0.66 0.58 0.77 30 10114 10 2 7 1 22
PDB_01194 - 0.44 0.33 0.63 5 488 3 1 2 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.79 0.64 1.00 14 1114 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_01203 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1162 2 2 0 0 7
PDB_01250 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12061 32 1 28 3 41
PDB_01260 - 0.58 0.44 0.79 11 1816 3 0 3 0 14
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9124 56 12 44 0 39
RFA_00632 0.36 0.36 0.37 10 4068 17 3 14 0 18
RFA_00636 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 3978 11 1 10 0 12
RFA_00767 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1878 13 1 12 0 18
RFA_00768 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1875 16 1 15 0 18
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2003 15 2 11 2 18
RFA_00773 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 19 1 16 2 18
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 2 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 3 1 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.