CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold ContextFold
MCC 0.458 > 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.083 > 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.435 > 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.491 < 0.499
Total TP 512 > 480
Total TN 158463 < 158545
Total FP 548 > 491
Total FP CONTRA 63 > 52
Total FP INCONS 468 > 429
Total FP COMP 17 > 10
Total FN 666 < 698
P-value 0.000990829372106

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 512
Total TN 158463
Total FP 548
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 468
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 666
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.20 0.20 4 1015 16 2 14 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.25 0.25 0.29 4 616 10 0 10 0 12
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 486 10 2 8 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.56 0.45 0.71 5 554 2 0 2 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 15185 40 4 36 0 25
PDB_00447 - 0.66 0.55 0.80 24 7110 6 6 0 0 20
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1996 8 1 7 0 9
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00804 - 0.22 0.24 0.21 12 15342 46 10 36 0 38
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 2259 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 1071 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 928 19 0 18 1 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4146 40 0 40 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 2259 3 1 1 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.29 0.30 0.30 6 1108 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.41 0.37 0.45 20 12676 24 0 24 0 34
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.70 0.65 0.76 34 10108 14 2 9 3 18
PDB_01194 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 485 11 0 11 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1158 5 3 2 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 6 12061 23 5 18 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 1811 5 1 4 0 11
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 364 14 0 14 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9117 64 9 54 1 39
RFA_00632 0.38 0.39 0.37 11 4065 19 0 19 0 17
RFA_00636 0.60 0.64 0.56 18 3973 14 4 10 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 2 0 0 2 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 5 0 2 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 4 1 0 3 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 0 8 0 10

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 480
Total TN 158545
Total FP 491
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 429
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 698
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.499
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00018 - 0.22 0.20 0.27 4 1020 11 2 9 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00134 - 0.57 0.50 0.67 4 372 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 372 6 1 5 0 8
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.50 0.42 0.63 5 622 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00370 - 0.12 0.16 0.10 4 15185 36 7 29 0 21
PDB_00447 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 7108 32 8 24 0 44
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - 0.42 0.38 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00804 - 0.86 0.84 0.88 42 15352 8 0 6 2 8
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.72 0.63 0.83 5 372 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.67 0.60 0.75 9 1069 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.67 0.57 0.80 4 320 1 0 1 0 3
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.33 6 1110 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01070 - 0.17 0.15 0.21 8 12682 30 0 30 0 46
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
PDB_01194 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.53 0.41 0.69 9 1115 4 0 4 0 13
PDB_01203 - 0.77 0.68 0.87 13 1161 2 2 0 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.22 0.20 0.24 8 12057 26 3 22 1 33
PDB_01260 - 0.52 0.36 0.75 9 1818 3 0 3 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 893 3 1 0 2 6
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9120 60 9 51 0 39
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.