CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Alterna
MCC 0.764 > 0.401
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.075 > 0.455 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.742 > 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.791 > 0.446
Total TP 636 > 319
Total TN 74778 < 74866
Total FP 184 < 415
Total FP CONTRA 31 < 37
Total FP INCONS 137 < 360
Total FP COMP 16 < 18
Total FN 221 < 538
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 636
Total TN 74778
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.742
Positive Predictive Value 0.791
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 319
Total TN 74866
Total FP 415
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 538
Total Scores
MCC 0.401
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.455 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.446
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.11 0.13 0.14 2 616 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.68 0.55 0.86 6 554 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.51 0.50 0.55 6 619 5 0 5 0 6
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.41 0.40 0.43 10 3298 13 3 10 0 15
PDB_00713 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1997 19 0 19 0 21
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 21 3 18 0 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 2258 3 2 1 0 7
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 4 4721 28 0 28 0 37
PDB_00857 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1068 13 0 13 0 15
PDB_00874 - 0.09 0.10 0.11 2 928 16 2 14 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.86 0.86 0.86 18 2464 6 0 3 3 3
PDB_01020 0.76 0.70 0.84 16 2259 4 2 1 1 7
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.49 0.43 0.60 3 226 2 2 0 0 4
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.57 16 4343 13 2 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 0 8 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1809 21 0 21 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.24 0.25 0.23 7 4065 23 3 20 0 21
RFA_00636 0.50 0.46 0.54 13 3981 13 3 8 2 15
RFA_00767 0.54 0.50 0.60 9 1876 6 2 4 0 9
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 9 0 6 3 10
RFA_00769 0.38 0.39 0.39 7 1935 11 2 9 0 11
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00809 0.38 0.38 0.40 6 2130 11 0 9 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.