CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold CentroidFold
MCC 0.764 > 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.075 > 0.582 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.742 > 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.791 > 0.616
Total TP 636 > 414
Total TN 74778 < 74910
Total FP 184 < 265
Total FP CONTRA 31 > 25
Total FP INCONS 137 < 233
Total FP COMP 16 > 7
Total FN 221 < 443
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 636
Total TN 74778
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.742
Positive Predictive Value 0.791
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.90 0.90 0.90 18 1015 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00020 - 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 762 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00041 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00053 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 424 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 4150 2 2 0 0 2
PDB_00124 - 0.86 0.90 0.82 9 485 2 2 0 0 1
PDB_00128 - 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 482 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00134 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00138 - 0.94 1.00 0.89 8 369 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00209 - 0.96 1.00 0.92 11 549 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_00243 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00352 - 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 1204 3 2 1 0 1
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00713 - 0.24 0.24 0.26 5 1997 14 0 14 0 16
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.43 0.42 0.45 10 2256 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_00842 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 1066 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_00874 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 930 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00886 - 0.34 0.35 0.35 14 4146 26 0 26 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.93 1.00 0.88 7 317 1 1 0 0 0
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 0
PDB_01059 - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 222 2 2 0 0 0
PDB_01073 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 4346 4 2 1 1 12
PDB_01194 - 0.97 0.93 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 1
PDB_01201 - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1108 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.41 0.36 0.47 9 1811 10 0 10 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.90 0.87 0.93 13 889 1 1 0 0 2
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 414
Total TN 74910
Total FP 265
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 233
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 443
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 45

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.38 0.35 0.44 7 764 9 0 9 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4151 35 0 35 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1209 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00713 - 0.54 0.48 0.63 10 2000 6 1 5 0 11
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.44 0.39 0.50 16 4721 16 0 16 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 929 17 0 17 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4148 38 0 38 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01194 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 487 9 0 9 0 15
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - 0.72 0.68 0.76 13 1159 4 3 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.64 0.48 0.86 12 1816 2 0 2 0 13
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.74 0.67 0.83 10 891 2 1 1 0 5
RFA_00632 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 4072 6 1 5 0 11
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 4 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.