CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.831 > 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.852 ± 0.102 > 0.637 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.834 > 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.830 > 0.748
Total TP 181 > 122
Total TN 25331 < 25386
Total FP 48 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 20
Total FP INCONS 26 > 21
Total FP COMP 11 > 1
Total FN 36 < 95
P-value 1.59816551561e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 25331
Total FP 48
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 36
Total Scores
MCC 0.831
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.852 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.834
Positive Predictive Value 0.830
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.78 0.79 0.79 11 932 3 0 3 0 3
PDB_00716 0.68 0.70 0.67 16 2677 9 0 8 1 7
RFA_00632 0.54 0.54 0.56 15 4068 12 2 10 0 13
RFA_00636 0.78 0.82 0.74 23 3974 8 7 1 0 5
RFA_00767 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 4 0 0 4 0
RFA_00768 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 1873 0 0 0 0 0
RFA_00769 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 1 1 0 0 0
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 3 0 0 3 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 4 1 0 3 0
RFA_00779 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 1936 0 0 0 0 1
RFA_00809 0.79 0.81 0.76 13 2128 4 0 4 0 3

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 25386
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.562
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 0.50 0.39 0.64 9 2687 6 0 5 1 14
RFA_00632 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 4074 2 1 1 0 9
RFA_00636 0.85 0.75 0.95 21 3983 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00767 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1878 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.52 0.39 0.70 7 2006 3 3 0 0 11
RFA_00773 0.59 0.50 0.69 9 1940 4 4 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.65 0.56 0.77 10 1940 3 3 0 0 8
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 11 1 10 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.