CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.862 > 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.862 ± 0.015 > 0.784 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.752 > 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.990 > 0.988
Total TP 100 > 82
Total TN 14632 < 14650
Total FP 3 > 2
Total FP CONTRA 1 > 0
Total FP INCONS 0 < 1
Total FP COMP 2 > 1
Total FN 33 < 51
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 14632
Total FP 3
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 33
Total Scores
MCC 0.862
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.862 ± 0.015
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.990
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 14650
Total FP 2
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.988
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 0 1 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 8
PDB_00829 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 2261 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01020 0.78 0.61 1.00 14 2264 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_01073 0.59 0.35 1.00 12 4359 1 0 0 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.