CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.476 > 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.473 ± 0.191 > 0.456 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.454 > 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.507 < 0.597
Total TP 113 > 83
Total TN 33713 < 33797
Total FP 120 > 57
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 3
Total FP INCONS 95 > 53
Total FP COMP 10 > 1
Total FN 136 < 166
P-value 3.04893053302e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 33713
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.473 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.507
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2678 24 1 22 1 23
PDB_01092 0.73 0.63 0.85 33 10114 8 0 6 2 19
RFA_00632 0.39 0.39 0.39 11 4067 17 2 15 0 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 16 2 14 0 16
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 8 0 5 3 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.37 0.38 0.38 6 2129 10 1 9 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 33797
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.443
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.