CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.539 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.138 > 0.502 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.501 > 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.586 > 0.523
Total TP 197 > 181
Total TN 48794 > 48784
Total FP 147 < 189
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 26
Total FP INCONS 115 < 139
Total FP COMP 8 < 24
Total FN 196 < 212
P-value 5.23753225208e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 197
Total TN 48794
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 196
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.586
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.59 0.36 1.00 5 941 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2681 21 1 19 1 23
PDB_00828 0.82 0.67 1.00 18 2467 0 0 0 0 9
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 2262 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01073 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 4343 4 1 2 1 9
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.79 33 10111 12 2 7 3 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 19 1 18 0 21
RFA_00636 0.35 0.36 0.36 10 3977 18 2 16 0 18
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00768 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 2 4 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00770 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1999 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00773 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 3 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.57 0.56 0.59 10 1936 7 2 5 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 19 2 14 3 16
RFA_00809 0.30 0.31 0.29 5 2128 12 1 11 0 11

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 48784
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 139
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01092 0.43 0.38 0.49 20 10112 23 2 19 2 32
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.