CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect NanoFolder
MCC 0.571 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.142 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.524 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.630 > 0.281
Total TP 87 > 57
Total TN 18891 > 18826
Total FP 54 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 22
Total FP INCONS 43 < 124
Total FP COMP 3 < 13
Total FN 79 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 18891
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 79
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.42 0.36 0.50 9 3303 9 2 7 0 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.45 0.39 0.53 16 4723 14 0 14 0 25
PDB_01009 0.51 0.57 0.46 12 2459 14 5 9 0 9
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 7 0 4 3 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00808 0.62 0.56 0.69 9 2003 4 0 4 0 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.