CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold NanoFolder
MCC 0.813 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.156 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.759 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.875 > 0.281
Total TP 126 > 57
Total TN 18885 > 18826
Total FP 29 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 22
Total FP INCONS 16 < 124
Total FP COMP 11 < 13
Total FN 40 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 18885
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 40
Total Scores
MCC 0.813
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.759
Positive Predictive Value 0.875
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.49 0.44 0.56 18 4721 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 5 0 2 3 2
RFA_00770 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 2002 4 0 0 4 4
RFA_00773 0.97 1.00 0.95 18 1934 5 1 0 4 0
RFA_00808 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 2000 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.