CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) Afold
MCC 0.481 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.124 > 0.445 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.320 < 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.730 > 0.491
Total TP 81 < 108
Total TN 34708 > 34599
Total FP 30 < 133
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 12
Total FP INCONS 30 < 100
Total FP COMP 0 < 21
Total FN 172 > 145
P-value 1.31873167448e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 34708
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.320
Positive Predictive Value 0.730
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 0.23 0.13 0.43 3 2694 4 0 4 0 20
PDB_01092 0.69 0.48 1.00 25 10128 0 0 0 0 27
RFA_00632 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 4088 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00636 0.21 0.11 0.43 3 3998 4 0 4 0 25
RFA_00767 0.47 0.33 0.67 6 1882 3 0 3 0 12
RFA_00768 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1883 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00769 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 1942 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00770 0.57 0.44 0.73 8 2005 3 0 3 0 10
RFA_00773 0.41 0.28 0.63 5 1945 3 0 3 0 13
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.50 0.38 0.67 6 2136 3 0 3 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 34599
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 5 0 4 1 8
RFA_00768 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.