CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.854 = 0.854
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.048 > 0.852 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.759 = 0.759
Positive Predictive Value 0.962 = 0.962
Total TP 101 = 101
Total TN 14628 = 14628
Total FP 12 > 7
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 2
Total FP INCONS 1 < 2
Total FP COMP 8 > 3
Total FN 32 = 32
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 14628
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 32
Total Scores
MCC 0.854
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.858 ± 0.048
Sensitivity 0.759
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_01020 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 2260 3 0 0 3 5
PDB_01073 0.79 0.71 0.89 24 4344 4 2 1 1 10

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 14628
Total FP 7
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 32
Total Scores
MCC 0.854
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.852 ± 0.034
Sensitivity 0.759
Positive Predictive Value 0.962
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 2259 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_01020 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 2259 3 1 1 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.