CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.729 > 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056 > 0.682 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 > 0.776
Total TP 285 > 266
Total TN 54590 < 54593
Total FP 70 < 86
Total FP CONTRA 33 > 17
Total FP INCONS 28 < 60
Total FP COMP 9 = 9
Total FN 154 < 173
P-value 2.39162260866e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 285
Total TN 54590
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00571 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 3299 2 2 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 3 2 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 2256 3 2 0 1 4
PDB_01009 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 2465 3 0 1 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 2257 4 2 0 2 4
PDB_01073 0.77 0.68 0.88 23 4345 4 2 1 1 11
PDB_01092 0.68 0.56 0.83 29 10118 8 0 6 2 23
RFA_00632 0.69 0.64 0.75 18 4071 6 2 4 0 10
RFA_00636 0.73 0.68 0.79 19 3981 5 2 3 0 9
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 266
Total TN 54593
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00571 0.77 0.64 0.94 16 3304 1 1 0 0 9
PDB_00716 0.33 0.30 0.37 7 2682 13 0 12 1 16
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01009 0.46 0.52 0.41 11 2458 16 5 11 0 10
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9
PDB_01092 0.71 0.63 0.80 33 10112 10 1 7 2 19
RFA_00632 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 4072 6 1 5 0 11
RFA_00636 0.64 0.64 0.64 18 3977 10 4 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00768 0.45 0.44 0.47 8 1874 9 1 8 0 10
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.64 0.50 0.82 9 2005 4 0 2 2 9
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 3 1 0 2 8
RFA_00779 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 1941 2 0 2 0 8
RFA_00808 0.75 0.56 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.43 0.38 0.50 6 2133 6 0 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.