CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) ContextFold
MCC 0.729 > 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056 > 0.590 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.540
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 > 0.675
Total TP 285 > 237
Total TN 54590 > 54585
Total FP 70 < 119
Total FP CONTRA 33 > 19
Total FP INCONS 28 < 95
Total FP COMP 9 > 5
Total FN 154 < 202
P-value 3.24519439238e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 285
Total TN 54590
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00571 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 3299 2 2 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 3 2 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 2256 3 2 0 1 4
PDB_01009 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 2465 3 0 1 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 2257 4 2 0 2 4
PDB_01073 0.77 0.68 0.88 23 4345 4 2 1 1 11
PDB_01092 0.68 0.56 0.83 29 10118 8 0 6 2 23
RFA_00632 0.69 0.64 0.75 18 4071 6 2 4 0 10
RFA_00636 0.73 0.68 0.79 19 3981 5 2 3 0 9
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 237
Total TN 54585
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 202
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.590 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.540
Positive Predictive Value 0.675
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 5 0 5 0 9
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2687 14 0 14 0 23
PDB_00828 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 3 0 2 1 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.48 0.44 0.54 15 4343 13 2 11 0 19
PDB_01092 0.70 0.63 0.77 33 10110 12 1 9 2 19
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.26 7 4068 20 1 19 0 21
RFA_00636 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 3986 7 0 7 0 16
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1876 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 8 4 4 0 8
RFA_00770 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 2001 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.61 0.56 0.67 10 1938 5 2 3 0 8
RFA_00808 0.58 0.44 0.78 7 2007 2 0 2 0 9
RFA_00809 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 2135 6 0 5 1 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.