CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.729 > 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056 > 0.520 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 > 0.538
Total TP 285 > 213
Total TN 54590 > 54540
Total FP 70 < 209
Total FP CONTRA 33 = 33
Total FP INCONS 28 < 150
Total FP COMP 9 < 26
Total FN 154 < 226
P-value 3.73174208038e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 285
Total TN 54590
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.80 0.64 1.00 9 937 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00571 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 3299 2 2 0 0 5
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 3 2 0 1 6
PDB_00829 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 2256 3 2 0 1 4
PDB_01009 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 2465 3 0 1 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 2257 4 2 0 2 4
PDB_01073 0.77 0.68 0.88 23 4345 4 2 1 1 11
PDB_01092 0.68 0.56 0.83 29 10118 8 0 6 2 23
RFA_00632 0.69 0.64 0.75 18 4071 6 2 4 0 10
RFA_00636 0.73 0.68 0.79 19 3981 5 2 3 0 9
RFA_00767 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00768 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1877 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00769 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00770 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 2002 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00773 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00779 0.63 0.56 0.71 10 1939 4 3 1 0 8
RFA_00808 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 2006 1 1 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 4 0 4 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 213
Total TN 54540
Total FP 209
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 226
Total Scores
MCC 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.42 0.36 0.50 5 936 6 0 5 1 9
PDB_00571 0.89 0.84 0.95 21 3299 2 1 0 1 4
PDB_00716 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2685 3 0 3 0 10
PDB_00828 0.85 0.81 0.88 22 2460 3 1 2 0 5
PDB_00829 0.78 0.75 0.82 18 2256 4 1 3 0 6
PDB_01009 0.45 0.52 0.39 11 2457 18 6 11 1 10
PDB_01020 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2256 5 1 2 2 4
PDB_01073 0.17 0.18 0.17 6 4336 29 3 26 0 28
PDB_01092 0.43 0.38 0.49 20 10112 23 2 19 2 32
RFA_00632 0.25 0.25 0.27 7 4069 22 1 18 3 21
RFA_00636 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 3978 19 1 15 3 17
RFA_00767 0.48 0.44 0.53 8 1876 8 1 6 1 10
RFA_00768 0.50 0.44 0.57 8 1877 8 1 5 2 10
RFA_00769 0.41 0.44 0.38 8 1932 13 3 10 0 10
RFA_00770 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1999 12 2 6 4 9
RFA_00773 0.42 0.39 0.47 7 1938 12 1 7 4 11
RFA_00779 0.26 0.28 0.26 5 1934 14 6 8 0 13
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 2 0 0 7
RFA_00809 0.47 0.38 0.60 6 2135 6 0 4 2 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.