Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
TurboFold(seed) |
| MCC |
0.638 |
>
|
0.600 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.630
±
0.056
|
<
|
0.632
±
0.110
|
| Sensitivity |
0.560 |
>
|
0.518 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.734 |
>
|
0.702 |
| Total TP |
94 |
>
|
87 |
| Total TN |
19695 |
<
|
19699 |
| Total FP |
34 |
<
|
41 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
21 |
>
|
7 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
<
|
30 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
<
|
4 |
| Total FN |
74 |
<
|
81 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and TurboFold(seed)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and TurboFold(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and TurboFold(seed)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
94 |
| Total TN |
19695 |
| Total FP |
34 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
21 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
| Total FN |
74 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.638 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.630
±
0.056
|
| Sensitivity |
0.560 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.734 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
87 |
| Total TN |
19699 |
| Total FP |
41 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
7 |
| Total FP INCONS |
30 |
| Total FP COMP |
4 |
| Total FN |
81 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.600 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.632
±
0.110
|
| Sensitivity |
0.518 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.702 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|