CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.840 > 0.803
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.845 ± 0.041 > 0.807 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.737 > 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.961 > 0.897
Total TP 98 > 96
Total TN 14631 > 14626
Total FP 12 < 13
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 6
Total FP INCONS 1 < 5
Total FP COMP 8 > 2
Total FN 35 < 37
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 14631
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.840
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.845 ± 0.041
Sensitivity 0.737
Positive Predictive Value 0.961
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 3300 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00828 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2466 2 0 0 2 8
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 2 0 0 2 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 3 0 0 3 6
PDB_01073 0.79 0.71 0.89 24 4344 4 2 1 1 10

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 14626
Total FP 13
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 37
Total Scores
MCC 0.803
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.807 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.897
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.60 0.60 0.60 15 3296 10 6 4 0 10
PDB_00828 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01073 0.86 0.74 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.