CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.538 > 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.173 > 0.463 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.472 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.620 > 0.585
Total TP 93 > 72
Total TN 23633 < 23660
Total FP 59 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 3
Total FP INCONS 45 < 48
Total FP COMP 2 > 0
Total FN 104 < 125
P-value 1.53777893337e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 23633
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.620
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 18 1 16 1 23
RFA_00632 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 4074 6 1 5 0 13
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 23660
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.463 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.585
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.47 0.36 0.63 5 938 3 0 3 0 9
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.