CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder CRWrnafold
MCC 0.508 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.084 > 0.494 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.432 > 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.609 > 0.518
Total TP 377 > 362
Total TN 76979 > 76899
Total FP 245 < 351
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 40
Total FP INCONS 220 < 297
Total FP COMP 3 < 14
Total FN 496 < 511
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 377
Total TN 76979
Total FP 245
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 220
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 496
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.432
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.20 0.20 0.22 4 1017 14 2 12 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.41 0.35 0.50 7 766 7 0 7 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 430 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - 0.75 0.61 0.92 22 4162 2 2 0 0 14
PDB_00124 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00128 - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 486 0 0 0 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.67 0.45 1.00 5 556 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00243 - 0.63 0.58 0.70 7 620 3 0 3 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.48 0.37 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 12
PDB_00571 0.39 0.36 0.43 9 3300 12 0 12 0 16
PDB_00713 - 0.46 0.43 0.50 9 1998 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2684 18 1 16 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 4726 23 0 23 0 37
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - 0.37 0.35 0.41 14 4152 20 0 20 0 26
PDB_00918 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 321 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01009 0.37 0.33 0.41 7 2468 10 0 10 0 14
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.30 0.30 0.32 6 1109 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 227 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_01073 0.43 0.38 0.50 13 4345 13 1 12 0 21
PDB_01194 - 0.52 0.33 0.83 5 490 1 1 0 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_01203 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1166 10 0 10 0 19
PDB_01260 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1817 13 0 13 0 25
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 897 6 2 4 0 15
RFA_00632 0.62 0.54 0.71 15 4074 6 1 5 0 13
RFA_00636 0.65 0.64 0.67 18 3978 9 3 6 0 10
RFA_00767 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1882 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00768 0.74 0.56 1.00 10 1881 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00769 0.50 0.50 0.50 9 1935 9 4 5 0 9
RFA_00770 0.47 0.39 0.58 7 2004 5 1 4 0 11
RFA_00773 0.67 0.50 0.90 9 1943 1 1 0 0 9
RFA_00779 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 3 0 2 1 7
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 76899
Total FP 351
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 297
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 511
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.518
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 1019 12 2 10 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.42 0.35 0.54 7 767 6 0 6 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4155 31 0 31 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.66 0.63 0.71 5 371 2 0 2 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.68 0.55 0.86 6 554 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1998 19 1 17 1 21
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.42 0.39 0.47 16 4719 18 4 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4152 34 0 34 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 321 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 4 0 2 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.31 0.30 0.35 6 1111 11 0 11 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 227 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.59 16 4344 12 1 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - 0.44 0.33 0.63 5 488 3 1 2 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.82 0.68 1.00 15 1113 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01260 - 0.44 0.36 0.56 9 1814 7 0 7 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 894 9 2 7 0 15
RFA_00632 0.37 0.36 0.38 10 4069 19 0 16 3 18
RFA_00636 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 3978 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2002 17 1 13 3 18
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.