CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RDfolder		ContextFold
MCC	0.508	>	0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.545 ± 0.084	>	0.539 ± 0.082
Sensitivity	0.432	<	0.441
Positive Predictive Value	0.609	>	0.577
Total TP	377	<	385
Total TN	76979	>	76931
Total FP	245	<	287
Total FP CONTRA	22	<	24
Total FP INCONS	220	<	258
Total FP COMP	3	<	5
Total FN	496	>	488
P-value	0.00119801349039

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RDfolder and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and ContextFold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and ContextFold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and ContextFold).

^top

Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	377
Total TN	76979
Total FP	245
Total FP CONTRA	22
Total FP INCONS	220
Total FP COMP	3
Total FN	496

Total Scores
MCC	0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.545 ± 0.084
Sensitivity	0.432
Positive Predictive Value	0.609
Nr of predictions	46

^top

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.79	1.00	11	935	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00018	-	0.20	0.20	0.22	4	1017	14	2	12	0	16
PDB_00020	-	0.41	0.35	0.50	7	766	7	0	7	0	13
PDB_00041	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	6	624	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00053	-	0.67	0.45	1.00	5	430	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00056	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	616	0	0	0	0	2
PDB_00123	-	0.75	0.61	0.92	22	4162	2	2	0	0	14
PDB_00124	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	491	0	0	0	0	5
PDB_00128	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	10	486	0	0	0	0	4
PDB_00134	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00138	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00209	-	0.67	0.45	1.00	5	556	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00243	-	0.63	0.58	0.70	7	620	3	0	3	0	5
PDB_00352	-	0.48	0.37	0.64	7	1214	4	0	4	0	12
PDB_00571	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.36	0.43	9	3300	12	0	12	0	16
PDB_00713	-	0.46	0.43	0.50	9	1998	9	0	9	0	12
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2684	18	1	16	1	23
PDB_00828	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.78	1.00	21	2464	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00829	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	2260	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00842	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	5	373	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00851	-	0.11	0.10	0.15	4	4726	23	0	23	0	37
PDB_00857	-	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	1072	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00874	-	0.10	0.10	0.13	2	931	13	2	11	0	18
PDB_00886	-	0.37	0.35	0.41	14	4152	20	0	20	0	26
PDB_00918	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	321	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_01009	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.41	7	2468	10	0	10	0	14
PDB_01020	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	17	2261	1	0	0	1	6
PDB_01040	-	0.30	0.30	0.32	6	1109	13	0	13	0	14
PDB_01059	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	227	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_01073	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.38	0.50	13	4345	13	1	12	0	21
PDB_01194	-	0.52	0.33	0.83	5	490	1	1	0	0	10
PDB_01201	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	16	1112	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_01203	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1166	10	0	10	0	19
PDB_01260	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1817	13	0	13	0	25
PDB_01281	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	366	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_01299	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	897	6	2	4	0	15
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.54	0.71	15	4074	6	1	5	0	13
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.64	0.67	18	3978	9	3	6	0	10
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	9	1882	0	0	0	0	9
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.56	1.00	10	1881	0	0	0	0	8
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.50	0.50	9	1935	9	4	5	0	9
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.39	0.58	7	2004	5	1	4	0	11
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.50	0.90	9	1943	1	1	0	0	9
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	9	1944	0	0	0	0	9
RFA_00808	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.82	9	2005	3	0	2	1	7
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.38	0.43	6	2131	8	1	7	0	10

^top

Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	385
Total TN	76931
Total FP	287
Total FP CONTRA	24
Total FP INCONS	258
Total FP COMP	5
Total FN	488

Total Scores
MCC	0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.539 ± 0.082
Sensitivity	0.441
Positive Predictive Value	0.577
Nr of predictions	46

^top

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
PDB_00005	Tymo_tRNA-like links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.36	0.50	5	936	5	0	5	0	9
PDB_00018	-	0.22	0.20	0.27	4	1020	11	2	9	0	16
PDB_00020	-	0.41	0.35	0.50	7	766	7	0	7	0	13
PDB_00041	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	6	624	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00053	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	429	0	0	0	0	5
PDB_00056	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	616	0	0	0	0	2
PDB_00123	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4151	35	0	35	0	36
PDB_00124	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	491	0	0	0	0	5
PDB_00128	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	8	488	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00134	-	0.57	0.50	0.67	4	372	2	0	2	0	4
PDB_00138	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	372	6	1	5	0	8
PDB_00209	-	0.67	0.45	1.00	5	556	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00243	-	0.50	0.42	0.63	5	622	3	0	3	0	7
PDB_00352	-	0.92	0.84	1.00	16	1209	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_00571	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.76	0.95	19	3301	1	1	0	0	6
PDB_00713	-	0.42	0.38	0.47	8	1999	9	0	9	0	13
PDB_00716	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2687	14	0	14	0	23
PDB_00828	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	20	2465	0	0	0	0	7
PDB_00829	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	2260	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_00842	-	0.72	0.63	0.83	5	372	1	0	1	0	3
PDB_00851	-	0.45	0.39	0.53	16	4723	14	0	14	0	25
PDB_00857	-	0.67	0.60	0.75	9	1069	3	0	3	0	6
PDB_00874	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	929	17	0	17	0	20
PDB_00886	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4151	35	0	35	0	40
PDB_00918	-	0.67	0.57	0.80	4	320	1	0	1	0	3
PDB_01009	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.90	0.90	19	2464	3	0	2	1	2
PDB_01020	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	17	2261	1	0	0	1	6
PDB_01040	-	0.30	0.30	0.33	6	1110	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_01059	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	4	227	0	0	0	0	3
PDB_01073	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.44	0.54	15	4343	13	2	11	0	19
PDB_01194	-	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	487	0	0	0	0	6
PDB_01201	-	0.53	0.41	0.69	9	1115	4	0	4	0	13
PDB_01203	-	0.77	0.68	0.87	13	1161	2	2	0	0	6
PDB_01260	-	0.52	0.36	0.75	9	1818	3	0	3	0	16
PDB_01281	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	366	12	0	12	0	14
PDB_01299	-	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	893	3	1	0	2	6
RFA_00632	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.25	0.25	0.26	7	4068	20	1	19	0	21
RFA_00636	HDV_ribozyme links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.43	0.63	12	3986	7	0	7	0	16
RFA_00767	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.56	0.63	10	1875	6	3	3	0	8
RFA_00768	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	1876	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00769	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.56	0.56	10	1935	8	4	4	0	8
RFA_00770	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	2001	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00773	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.56	0.63	10	1937	6	1	5	0	8
RFA_00779	Corona_pk3 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.56	0.67	10	1938	5	2	3	0	8
RFA_00808	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.44	0.78	7	2007	2	0	2	0	9
RFA_00809	RydC links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.31	0.50	5	2135	6	0	5	1	11

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]